The left column is ours to fill and ours to be held to in a trial. The right column belongs to TaxDome, and it stays ruled and empty against every row below, because the only thing we could put in it is a guess.
Run onboarding, document requests, e-signature and messaging through one place the client actually logs into, instead of four links and a mail thread.
That is the job as we read it. A firm shortlisting TaxDome is shopping for it, and so is a firm shortlisting Accute.
TaxDome
How they read the same job is theirs to publish.
Onboarding runs in the client's own browser on a secure link from the firm, and once the firm approves it that same record becomes the client's portal login. Behind that login sit document requests, e-signature and message threads, with outstanding balances shown alongside them; paying an invoice finishes on a secure link issued by the same system. A document request carries the client, an owner, a due date and a per-document status, so a half-answered request reads as half answered, and a message thread attaches to the engagement task it concerns, so staff and client are reading the same thread against the same piece of work. Signatures collected in the portal are drawn signatures, recorded with the signer, the time, the IP address and the user agent, and labelled in the product as drawn rather than cryptographic; separately, every uploaded document is hashed with SHA-256 and that hash signed RSA-SHA256 under the firm's own key. Our own effort went into the layer above the portal: an installed agent can be run against an engagement task, with that task, its engagement and its client as the context, and its output is written back onto the work record for a human to review.
TaxDome
We have not run their software, so we have nothing honest to put here.
Every mechanism named in that answer, listed on its own so you can put each one to us separately. Each survived an audit against the code that ships it, and anything that did not survive was struck rather than softened.
TaxDome
Nothing tested, so nothing cited, so nothing claimed.
In the words we would use to a partner on a call, including the one a comparison page usually leaves out.
Accute is the alternative we can speak for. Onboarding runs in the client's own browser on a secure link from the firm, and once the firm approves it that same record becomes the client's portal login. Behind that login sit document requests, e-signature and message threads, with outstanding balances shown alongside them; paying an invoice finishes on a secure link issued by the same system. A document request carries the client, an owner, a due date and a per-document status, so a half-answered request reads as half answered, and a message thread attaches to the engagement task it concerns, so staff and client are reading the same thread against the same piece of work. Signatures collected in the portal are drawn signatures, recorded with the signer, the time, the IP address and the user agent, and labelled in the product as drawn rather than cryptographic; separately, every uploaded document is hashed with SHA-256 and that hash signed RSA-SHA256 under the firm's own key. Our own effort went into the layer above the portal: an installed agent can be run against an engagement task, with that task, its engagement and its client as the context, and its output is written back onto the work record for a human to review.
It depends on whether the firm expects to add services. Accute is one product inside the FinACEverse suite. Staff can reach it through the suite gateway rather than through a second password: CAP issues a signed token carrying the user and the firm, and Accute verifies that token and starts the session. Where a firm account is linked to CAP, the tax-filing and audit-automation subscriptions Accute honours are read from that same suite record rather than registered again here.
No. We have not run TaxDome through a firm season, so we publish no pricing for it and make no claims about its features. This page states the job firms hire accounting practice management to do and what Accute does against that job, which is the only half we can be held to. For the other half, read what TaxDome publishes itself.
These questions decide this category. Put every one of them to TaxDome, to Accute, and to anything else on your shortlist, and buy whichever answers them on a screen rather than in a deck.
The rules every page in this family is written under, printed here because you may never see the index.
Plans change, currencies differ and term discounts move the number. A price we captured once and never re-checked would be presented as current while being wrong, so we publish none. Every vendor below publishes its own pricing, and that page is the only one worth reading.
We have not run their software through a firm season, so we are not in a position to say what it does or does not do. Anyone who tells you otherwise about a product they have not used is guessing in public.
What each entry states is the job a firm hires the category to do, and what Accute does against that job. That half is ours, it is testable in a trial, and you should hold us to it.
So: no TaxDome pricing on this page, and nothing about what TaxDome does or does not do. TaxDome publishes both, and that is the page worth reading for their half.
Same contract, same two columns, a different product on the empty side of them.
Run one real engagement through Accute, on your own client list, and hold every line in the left column against what you see. We will set that up with you rather than hand you a trial and hope.
Accounts and plans live in the FinACEverse gateway, so nothing on this page asks you for a card.